Fish and Wildlife
Pierson v. Post
- Facts: Defendant (Pierson) shot fox that plaintiff (Post) was chasing. Defendant claimed the fox.
- Issue: Did Plaintiff claim the fox by pursuing it?
- History: Trial Court ruled for Plaintiff
- Result: For Defendant, reversed.
- Dissent: The court should award the fox to the plaintiff because he was doing a service eliminating the fox, which is a pest.
Ghen v. Rich
- Facts: Plaintiff shot whale, and lost track of it. Ellis found the whale on the beach some time later and auctioned it. Defendant purchased the whale and processed it.
- Result: For plaintiff.
- Issue: Can the court
No comments:
Post a Comment